Share

ConCourt to hear credit appeal

Johannesburg - The Constitutional Court will hear an appeal on Tuesday on whether a credit provider's failure to register under the National Credit Act invalidates a loan agreement that is exempted from regulation.

The court will also be asked to look at whether a surety can be held liable for accumulated interest greater than the capital amount of a loan.

In 2006, the Paulsen couple entered into a bridging finance agreement, through the company Winskor 139, to borrow R12m from Slip Knot Investments 777, with interest calculated at three percent a month.

The Paulsens, in their personal capacity, signed a deed of suretyship in favour of Slip Knot as security for the loan.

In 2007, Winskor defaulted on the loan repayment to Slip Knot. There was a large amount of accrued interest.

Slip Knot took the matter to the Western Cape High Court and was successful in seeking repayment from the Paulsens. They then appealed to a full Bench of the court.

The high court confirmed that they owed the capital amount, but held that the interest awarded be limited at R12m under a rule which provides that interest stops accruing on a debt once it reaches the capital amount.

The Supreme Court of Appeal agreed that the Paulsens owed the capital sum, but found that the rule on interest ceases when litigation starts.

This meant interest continued to accrue between the start of litigation and the high court judgment. This resulted in an award of more than R12m in interest.

The Paulsens will argue in the Constitutional Court that Slip Knot was required to register as a credit provider under the act, even though the loan agreement was exempted from its regulations and requirements.

They argue that, as Slip Knot was not registered, the loan agreement was unlawful and void.

Alternatively, they will argue that the rule on interest should apply and limit their debt in this respect to R12m.

Slip Knot will counter that it was not required to register because it exclusively provided bridging finance loans to large-scale property developers, all of which were exempt from the act.

Even if it was registered, the loan agreement was not subject to the act, and its failure to register could not render the agreement invalid.

It will contend that the SCA's finding on interest was legally correct and based on sound public policy considerations.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Do you think corruption-accused National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula will survive a motion of no confidence against her?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, her days are numbered
40% - 218 votes
Yes, the ANC caucus will protect her
60% - 325 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
19.00
-0.5%
Rand - Pound
24.02
-0.5%
Rand - Euro
20.51
-0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.34
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.6%
Platinum
900.15
+0.4%
Palladium
1,000.00
-0.2%
Gold
2,209.06
+0.7%
Silver
24.59
-0.2%
Brent Crude
86.09
-0.2%
Top 40
68,122
+0.7%
All Share
74,310
+0.5%
Resource 10
56,908
+2.2%
Industrial 25
103,615
+0.3%
Financial 15
16,488
-0.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE