Publications
Partners
The World Health Organisation has proposed reforms that could overhaul its structure after botching the response to the biggest-ever Ebola outbreak, a sluggish performance that experts say cost thousands of lives.
Slow to grasp the significance of Ebola
On Sunday, several dozen of WHO's member countries approved a resolution aimed at strengthening the U.N. health agency's ability to respond to emergencies, though many of the details have yet to be worked out and it's unclear what concrete changes will result.
"The WHO we have is not the WHO we need," said Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the U.S. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. He said decisions at the WHO were often made for political rather than scientific reasons.
WHO's chief, Dr. Margaret Chan, acknowledged Sunday that the WHO was too slow to grasp the significance of the Ebola outbreak, which is estimated to have killed more than 8,600 people, mainly in Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone.
Critics say the kinds of reform being adopted are long overdue.
Read: Schools to reopen in Sierra Leone as Ebola abates
"The groundswell of dissatisfaction and lack of trust in the WHO over Ebola has reached such a crescendo that (without) fundamental reform, I think we might lose confidence in the WHO for a generation," said Lawrence Gostin, director of the WHO Collaborating Centre on Public Health Law and Human Rights at Georgetown University.
"Ebola revealed all of the WHO's inherent weaknesses and the international community saw painfully what it was like to see the WHO not being able to lead. That resulted in thousands of deaths that were completely avoidable," he said.
In a resolution adopted by the WHO's executive board, nearly 60 countries called on the agency to take "immediately necessary steps" to enact measures including the creation of an emergency fund to respond to health crises. Britain's Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Sally Davies, announced the U.K. would donate $10 million to the proposed fund.
Slashed outbreak department
The resolution also called for the establishment of a reserve of health workers to battle epidemics, but didn't specify how large this workforce would be. The WHO conceded that, despite public expectations that it can respond quickly to health emergencies, it simply is not designed to do that.
The proposed changes undermine the WHO's own decision two years ago to slash its outbreak department and challenges the agency's past insistence that its expertise is in issuing technical guidance, not acting as a first responder.
Read: Ebola: from devastation to survival and solidarity
Countries also proposed that the WHO's director-general should be able to "add or change staff with appropriate expertise at the country and regional level." In an internal draft document obtained last year by The Associated Press, officials at the WHO's Geneva headquarters blamed its Africa office for botching initial efforts to contain Ebola.
Dr. Bruce Aylward, who is leading the WHO's response to Ebola, said country and regional offices hadn't yet signed off on these reforms and that hammering out those details might be challenging.
"A lot of this is still to be discussed, what this will actually look like," he said.
Gostin said no other agency has a mandate to protect public health that could easily replace the WHO.
"If we didn't have a WHO, we would need to create one," he said. "But we need to make them politically accountable for their failures and force them to be leaders."
Read more:
WHO admits botched response to Ebola in Africa
Liberia could be Ebola-free by June
Signs that Ebola 'may be levelling off' in Sierra Leone
Image: World Health Organisation from Shutterstock
