Publications
Partners
Cape Town - Opposition parties argued on Thursday that President Jacob Zuma and Public Protector Thuli Madonsela should appear before the ad hoc committee set up to consider his response to her findings on the Nkandla controversy.
The call was made as the special 12-member committee created by Parliament to consider the president's reply sat for the first time on Thursday.
"I don't see why anybody would not want to come and respond to the allegations against them," DA parliamentary leader Lindiwe Mazibuko said.
"We hope people will be willing to accept an invitation, but this committee has the legal power to subpoena anybody," she said.
The committee is chaired by National Assembly house chairperson Cedric Frolick and is due to finish its work by 30 April.
It will only reconvene on Monday, making an exhaustive inquiry into Madonsela's findings regarding the R246m spent on improvements at the president's private Nkandla homestead in KwaZulu-Natal unlikely.
Recommendations
Frolick suggested the committee might well make recommendations to the new legislature, constituted after the 7 May elections, to deal with the matter more thoroughly.
"Everything does not cease to be on 7 May. We cannot tell the fifth Parliament what to do, but we can make recommendations," he told Sapa.
The ANC majority on the committee rejected pleas from the opposition that it continue its deliberations on Friday, saying they needed the weekend to study Zuma's response to Madonsela, as well as her full 443-page report.
The president handed a copy of the report, titled Secure in Comfort, to Parliament along with his one-page response, in which he defers the matter until the Special Investigation Unit completes its own probe into Nkandla.
By law, Zuma was obliged to attach Madonsela's report to his response and this has paved the way for opposition parties to push for it to be debated in the committee, the last likely opportunity for parliamentary debate on the Nkandla spending before the country goes to the polls.
ANC MPs had argued that the mandate of the committee be restricted to Zuma's letter only.
Frolick, however, said: "It would be silly to say we must restrict ourselves to a one-page letter."
