- Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
Official EFF policy: “The transfer of wealth from the minority should fundamentally focus on the commanding heights of the economy. This should include minerals, metals, banks, energy production, and telecommunications and retain the ownership of central transport and logistics modes such as Transnet, Sasol, Mittal Steel, Eskom, Telkom and all harbours and airports.”
This matches pretty closely. Why the state should have anything to do with communication or transport eludes me. In fact, this gives them great power to impose on our civil liberties by having monopoly power over key industries. Also, I can’t see how some politician or bureaucrat will be able to make cell phone services cheaper or better than the services we pay for now.
- Extension of factories and instruments of productionowned by the State; the bringing into cultivationof waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Official EFF policy: “Within the context of a state-led industrial policy, the state should protect infant industries, particularly in areas where the country does not enjoy competitive advantages.”
How protecting or subsidising industries in South Africa that aren’t competitive is going to help our economy is unclear. We do not compete with China on mass-producing things like clothes or electronics, because we can’t. For the most part we can’t produce better quality products at better prices than they can in China (the reasons for this might be that we have too much government interference in business and labour markets already). Why try to keep industries alive to compete in markets where we can’t be competitive and profitable? It is better to focus resources and people on industries in which we have a fighting chance, like agriculture or mining. The free market is very good at allocating capital, and not wasting time on unprofitable and pointless ventures. How the unemployment crisis will be helped by the state throwing good resources after bad is unclear.
- Equal liabilityof all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Official EFF policy: “In line with the Freedom Charter and a new vision of agrarian revolution, the state should also provide implements and related extension services to help those who work the land to use it productively. Furthermore, the state’s procurement of food should prioritise small-scale farmers so that small-scale farming becomes a sustainable economic activity for the majority of our people.”
Chairman Mao (Chinese communist dictator 1949-1976) asserted in 1957 that the communist Chinese economy would surpass the UK in size within 15 years. Under the ‘Great Leap Forward’ policy, private property was abolished in 1958, and collective agricultural co-operatives were introduced. A famine ensued from 1959 to 1961, resulting in the deaths of 40 million people. The tragedy of the commons.
- Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of the populationover the country.
Official EFF policy: “Rural development should not be confined to maintaining the rurality of rural areas. It should, instead, aim to abolish rural and town distinctions. To this end, the department of land reform and rural development should be called the department of rural industrialisation and urbanisation and work closely with other government departments to uplift the economies of rural areas.”
Will the state build farms in cities, or cities in rural areas? Or will they forcibly move people to where some bureaucrat think they belong?
10. Free educationfor all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labourin its present form and combination of education with industrial production.
EFF policy can be fairly described as communist.
“If only communism in all its glory had been tried in the past to see if it could work.”
You can read the full article here.