Publications
Partners
WE ARE ONE
These words form the motto, mind- set, and goal of the world’s elite humanists, their establishment puppets and their rank and file useful idiots.
Of course this utopian ideal has always featured as the pinnacle attainment throughout human history, the possibility of its achievement never being in doubt, only the question of the when and how.
At its basis is control, of resources, of others, and so-called human destiny itself. The control of the many by the few- if this sounds a touch dictatorial- that’s because it is, a whole lot in fact.
By getting as many people as possible on board- even having them looking forward to the ride- is viewed as half the battle won by those at the helm.
Their objective is to transform society across the spectrum; from religion to education, sociology to politics, and economics to science and technology, all under a global government.
Carl Teichrib, a Canadian-based researcher and writer, is chief editor of Forcing Change- a monthly intelligence journal which analysers and documents global, political, and socio-religious trends.
He is right on the mark with his observations- as anyone who closely follows global trends will realize. He has claimed there are fifty five known global conferences in 2015 to promote global governance.
In his excellent article, ‘Creating a new society- Change Agents and Influence Peddlers’ he explains that social engineering is an activity of shifting the mind and heart of individuals-and changing personal and group behaviour – a progressive endeavour.
Change agents understand that if a culture is to fundamentally shift in a permanent way, then social values must move gradually until a tipping point is reached. For this to occur, institutional hubs must first be altered from within- Government, education, and religious organisations. Once the gatekeepers in these sectors accept the new order, the larger pool of individuals that comprise civilisation will experience a push toward transformation.
Foundations- the preserve of the rich- who set-up these to influence society- and spend a lot of money to this end –have in the last 100 years been in the forefront as change agents.
Think-tanks, executive organisations, and high academia are part of a lot of these seemingly philanthropic foundations.
It must be noted here that not ALL foundations and think tanks operate as agents of societal transformation, but there is a select core of progressives that carry this banner.
Carl Teichrib, writes of his experiences in attending international seminars, - he mentions the FIM Global Governance conference where leading figures from the World Federalist Movement, the World Trade Organisation, and the United Nations brainstormed with representatives from government and non-governmental organisations.
He mentions the items of interest up for discussion as follows; world taxation schemes- the creation of a people’s world parliament, UN empowerment, and the question of how local administrations(city, county, municipal) could be involved in the growing sphere of international governance. The Canadian minister of foreign affairs at that time- Bill Graham- responded during a questions and answers session that he supported the idea of a global parliament attached to the World Trade Organisation. The funders of this event were the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations.
In 1995- the UN –linked Commission on Global Governance released its seminal report- Our Global Neighbourhood- funded in part by the Ford, Carnegie and MacArthur foundations.
This commission played a massive role in advancing the debate on global governance, including the idea of a global carbon tax, and carbon-trading system. Another suggestion was the creation of an internationally controlled elite military force.
Foundations can be seen as almost a fourth branch of government in the U.S., influencing Congress, U.S. Federal Agencies and Presidential Administrations.
In fact, P.J. Crowley, currently serving as assistant Secretary in the U.S. Department, called these institutions the closest thing we have to a shadow government.
As government policy and programmes line-up with the worldview of these titan foundations and their interlocking circles, other civic and social institutions – education, media and religious bodies-
start parroting the new paradigm. Segments of the general population under the constant pressures of change, accept the transformation rhetoric.
Feed- back loops play a crucial role, firstly, the foundation/think tank community conducts and reports on studies, takes polls, and monitors public responses. Armed with supporting data from the general public, elites present their findings to governments, who in turn, tweak existing programmes, create new ones, and implement administration changes to reflect the new reality.
Eventually this filters into the public space, and the feed-back loop begins another cycle.
The masses then accept the new worldview and transformation agenda as the only viable option to fix society’s problems. These feed-backs become more emotional and populist, with the vocal public demanding that schools, governments etc. change to meet the times. This aroused crowd may emerge as a movement. This is a convergence at the grassroots level, with emotions and activities
dedicated to a new worldview, and about community and belonging, and having a mass ownership in the change. Pressure is exerted upward into higher social and political strata, and as the public mood gains energy, policy makers respond. Foundations and think-tanks in turn discuss and debate the nature of this social evolution, and feed their insights back into the system.
And so the cycle is fuelled for the next incremental round.
