KPMG report to be used as basis for new Zuma representations to NPA?

Oh, the extreme irony!

The presidency has indicated in a press statement that it might use KPMG's about turn on the report drawn up by the KPMG auditor Johan van der Walt - and officially signed off by KPMG - on the so called SARS rogue unit as a possible reason for it to make fresh representations to the presidency's sycophant Shaun the Sheep Abrahams. It's typical and vintage Zuma783.

Grabbing at any straw that drifts along. Making things up on the go.

The so called SARS "rogue unit" narrative was a Zuma783 intelligence operation and hatchet job to replace the previous leadership of SARS and capture the institution like the Treasury was captured. Like Johann Van Loggerenberg explained, it was actually Tom Moyane who introduced the notion of a so called rogue unit after different panels appointed by him was already investigating. There were a number of different panels like the Kroon, Kayane and Sikhakane panel before the KPMG report - all appointed by Moyane - and none of them gave people like Johann Van Loggerenberg and Ivan Pillay the right to reply to allegations.

It was Moyane who introduced the notion of a so called rogue unit and it was the Zuma783 cabal who planted the so called rogue unit narrative in the Sunday Times trough Adv Rudolf Mastenbroek, whose ex wife, Phylicia Oppelt, was Sunday Times editor at the time.

Tom Moyane still stands vehemently by the findings of the KPMG report, whilst Moyane's boss and brother in law, Zuma783, wants to use KPMG's withdrawal of the report as a basis for fresh representations to Shaun the Sheep. LOL!

Is it not an extreme irony that the presidency wants to question the integrity of others, whilst not having a shred of integrity themselves?

Incidentally KPMG acted like a captured corporate entity, doing the Zupta cabal's bidding, so much so that they "overlooked" the theft of R30 million of taxpayer money to use for the Gupta wedding in Dubai. Now the presidency wants to use KPMG's lack of integrity, whilst so much depending on that lack of integrity in the past?