Share

'We never apologised to Zuma over reshuffle' - Mantashe

Cape Town - African National Congress secretary general Gwede Mantashe says he and other senior party members who spoke out against President Jacob Zuma's cabinet reshuffle were never asked to apologise at the party's NWC meeting earlier this month.

"No there was no apology. We were not even asked to," he told radio 702 on air on Wednesday.

"We had a discussion which was very fruitful and very constructive. Nobody was asked to apologise."

He was referring to the party's national working committee meeting on April 5.

On Friday, Zuma's lawyers filed heads of arguments to the Constitutional Court in the United Democratic Movement's bid for a secret ballot in the upcoming motion of no confidence against him.

Reference is made to Ramaphosa and Mantashe's "public apology" for speaking out against Zuma's decision to reshuffle his Cabinet on March 30. It was the president's prerogative, they apparently said.

NWC member Derek Hanekom said on Twitter that both Mantashe and Ramaphosa were not asked to apologise at the meeting.

"That is perfectly true. I was at the NWC meeting. There was nothing to apologise for," Hanekom tweeted.

Mantashe said Zuma's legal team needed to clarify what they meant by claiming he and Ramaphosa had apologised.

Presidency spokesperson Bongani Ngqulunga said it was not practice for them to comment on a matter before court.

He did, however, say the claim about Mantashe apologising was not in Zuma's replying affidavit filed a week earlier. It was only in the heads of argument Zuma's lawyers had filed.

The lawyers could not immediately be reached for comment on Wednesday.

ANC discipline not a threat to MPs

According to the papers, Zuma said it was a mistake to think party discipline could serve as intimidation of ANC MPs during the vote.

"It is incorrect to suggest, as the applicant does, that the president is confusing his role as the president of the ANC and his role as the president of the republic.

"It is trite that the legal effect of our constitutionally determined political system is that members elected on party lists who are allocated to legislative bodies under a...  system of proportional representation are accountable to their respective parties and Parliament.

"The party is accountable to the electorate."

MPs were therefore obliged to remain loyal to their party decisions, as the party was ultimately accountable to its voters.

"The obligation of loyalty to party is not inimical to the notion of an accountable, responsive, open and democratic government. The ANC is in no different a position."

Zuma said the court could not preclude a political party from taking disciplinary steps against a member who violated its constitution.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
66% - 624 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
34% - 328 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.99
+0.2%
Rand - Pound
23.76
+0.2%
Rand - Euro
20.37
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.42
-0.2%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.4%
Platinum
932.90
+0.8%
Palladium
994.00
+0.4%
Gold
2,339.44
+0.3%
Silver
27.62
+0.7%
Brent Crude
89.01
+1.1%
Top 40
68,437
0.0%
All Share
74,329
0.0%
Resource 10
62,119
0.0%
Industrial 25
102,531
0.0%
Financial 15
15,802
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE