Share

OPINION: Privilege still dominates rugby culture

South African rugby is all about race and privilege perpetuated by stereotypes that assert that only Africans who went to former model C schools are good enough to play, writes Zukile Mazwi.

Culture as defined by Wikipedia is an umbrella term which encompasses the social behaviour and norms found in human societies, as well as the knowledge, beliefs, arts, laws, customs, capabilities and habits of the individuals in these groups.

Culture is everything when it comes to team sport and especially rugby. The most successful teams always punt the importance of a great culture to achieve great results. In 1995, when the Springboks won the Rugby World Cup on home soil, then captain Francois Pienaar commended the culture and unity and one common goal as the key to their success. Even though he was trying his best to be politically correct at the time, he touted the Madiba magic as having played a critical role.

Culture however has a nasty way of encouraging separation from those who do not share the same beliefs or look different than the majority who support the culture; this we have seen and heard of in the number of group attacks instigated by teammates or groups of friends, whereby there is always a need to show allegiance to your own due to the beliefs that you share.

It is no surprise that racism will always be seen as part of the Springbok team and the rugby playing community in South Africa at large. Springbok teams continue to use Afrikaans as a medium of communication on the field; lineout calls as well as general set plays are often communicated in Afrikaans. Surely such an environment is not accommodating to non-Afrikaans speakers, especially those of African descent.

Pieter du Toit: In defence of the Springboks, rugby and the Bomb Squad

In order for South Africa to have a truly representative team, the culture of the game as it is needs to be changed. This can be achieved through the intervention of government in rugby, not to dictate selection, but to impose a framework within which rugby selection processes must operate. The introduction of the quota system by former SA Rugby boss Brian van Rooyen et al was a great initiative, but it was not well accepted by the Stellenbosch mafia, who continue to dictate what happens in the game.

South African rugby is all about race and privilege perpetuated by stereotypes that assert that only those Africans who went to former Model C schools are good enough to play, basing their assumptions purely on the culture in those schools.

At first glance of the so-called "bomb squad" video, I was disgusted because that sort of behaviour is to be expected within South African rugby circles. I found it very odd that no African player formed part of that huddle, and yet Herschel Jantjies was a foot away from them and came off the bench as well.

Such behaviour reminded me of stories the late Solly Tyibilika used to tell us about the environment and attitude of certain players in the Springbok set-up. The culture of racial intolerance in rugby is still prevalent to this very day. Skilled African players are mostly played out of position just to frustrate them. Chester Williams was a centre converted to a wing. Khaya Malotana, a centre, was also played at wing in the 1999 World Cup; JP Pieterson, a fullback converted to wing. Now we see one of the most talented fullbacks in the world, Cheslin Kolbe also being played at wing.

African players are always expected to keep their opinions to themselves; they are expected to stick to their lane and do as they are told. If it was not for public pressure and the racial window dressing in the current team, I do not think Siya Kolisi would be captain. In fact, many are not happy that he is captain.

READ: Mapimpi explains celebration 'snub' as video goes viral

Certain high schools are seen as the meccas of South African rugby; their players always given preference in selection, potentially leaving out the most talented players. Privilege plays a big role in making it in rugby which makes it very difficult for those from not so privileged backgrounds and schooling.

The culture of rugby in South Africa is appalling and needs to be redefined, but for as long as we have token blacks such as Mark Alexander at the helm of SA Rugby, we will not see any change.

Twenty-five years into democracy, SA Rugby is still failing to meet the 50% transformation target. What a shame!

- Zukile Mazwi is a former rugby player.

Disclaimer: News24 encourages freedom of speech and the expression of diverse views. The views of columnists published on News24 are therefore their own and do not necessarily represent the views of News24. 

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Should the Proteas pick Faf du Plessis for the T20 World Cup in West Indies and the United States in June?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
Yes! Faf still has a lot to give ...
67% - 970 votes
No! It's time to move on ...
33% - 470 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.76
+1.4%
Rand - Pound
23.43
+0.3%
Rand - Euro
20.08
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.25
+0.3%
Rand - Yen
0.12
+0.2%
Platinum
924.10
-0.0%
Palladium
959.00
+0.1%
Gold
2,337.68
0.0%
Silver
27.19
-0.0%
Brent Crude
89.50
+0.6%
Top 40
69,358
+1.3%
All Share
75,371
+1.4%
Resource 10
62,363
+0.4%
Industrial 25
103,903
+1.3%
Financial 15
16,161
+2.2%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE