Share

Judgment reserved in protesting soldiers' case

Bloemfontein - Judgment was reserved on Tuesday in an appeal over whether the SA National Defence Force acted fairly in taking disciplinary action against soldiers who took part in an illegal march.

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) heard argument in an appeal by the defence department against a decision that its disciplining of the soldiers did not meet the requirements of justice and fairness.

The soldiers are members of the SA National Defence Union (Sandu).

The union members were accused of disobeying a command to return to base after participating in an illegal march to the Union Buildings in 2009.

The present appeal involves notices to the soldiers by the department, including media statements, published in two newspapers on 14 November 2012 and 15 November 2012.

A full Bench of the SCA questioned aspects of the department's notices, such as whether the soldiers had enough time to react to them.

Judge Malcolm Wallis further wanted to know how the department expected a soldier to react if he would have received his letter, and seen a newspaper article on it on the same day.

The soldier would have had before him different charges, different allegations, and different time periods on record.

Julian Dreyer, for the department, conceded there were disparities in the notices to the soldiers.

He submitted that this fact did not give soldiers the right to do nothing.

Gilbert Marcus, for Sandu, contended it would be unfair to expect a soldier to look at the notices "through the microscope of a lawyer" in a short space of time.

To put the onus on the soldier alone would be unfair, he submitted.

He contended the department's disciplinary steps regarding the notices were vague and inadequate, and therefore unlawful and unfair.

It was further argued in papers that the department had a duty to ensure the soldiers facing dismissal were treated lawfully and fairly.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Do you think corruption-accused National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula will survive a motion of no confidence against her?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, her days are numbered
41% - 424 votes
Yes, the ANC caucus will protect her
59% - 600 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.93
+0.0%
Rand - Pound
23.90
+0.0%
Rand - Euro
20.40
+0.1%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.33
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.0%
Platinum
908.05
+1.2%
Palladium
1,014.94
+1.3%
Gold
2,232.75
-0.0%
Silver
24.95
-0.1%
Brent Crude
87.00
+1.8%
Top 40
68,346
0.0%
All Share
74,536
0.0%
Resource 10
57,251
0.0%
Industrial 25
103,936
0.0%
Financial 15
16,502
0.0%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE