Share

Woodstock residents win right to challenge City of Cape Town on housing

Residents facing eviction from their homes in Bromwell Street, Woodstock, are entitled to challenge the City of Cape Town’s housing plan, the Western Cape High Court has ruled.

The residents believe the City has gone against its own policy by excluding them and others from two sites near the CBD earmarked for transitional housing, GroundUp reports.

Advocate Sheldon Magardie, for the residents, said there had been a "change of course" on the part of the City to which the residents wanted to respond.

The nine Bromwell Street families opposing their eviction by the Woodstock Hub approached the High Court in September 2016 in an attempt to compel the City to provide them with emergency housing near Woodstock. At the time, the City said only transitional housing in Wolwerivier and Blikkiesdorp was available.

The eviction order was suspended and the matter was remanded on September 14, 2017, for mediation.

Read: Bromwell Street judge stuns with court comments

Since then, the City has issued information on a plan to create more affordable and social housing close to the inner city. Eleven sites in and around the city centre have been earmarked for development. The Bromwell Road residents want to amend their initial arguments to take into account this information. They also plan to challenge the validity and fairness of the City’s implementation of the housing plan.

On Tuesday, the Western Cape High Court ruled in favour of the application brought by the residents.

'Constitutional obligations to other poor people'

In his argument, Magardie said two sites – in Pickwick Street, Woodstock and James Street, Salt River, earmarked by the City for transitional housing – were on a list of sites identified and suggested by residents nearly two years ago.

The Woodstock Hospital site had been identified by residents in December 2016. On January 16, 2017, Magardie said the City had said the property "would not be viable or suitable for emergency accommodation". But, in November 2017, the City filed additional papers stating that it had bought the property and that it would be used for social and affordable housing.

Magardie argued that the Bromwell Street residents had been prejudiced against, because only people living on City-owned property had been prioritised to benefit from the transitional housing.

"This raises a serious question about whether or not the City is implementing its policies reasonably," said Magardie.

WATCH:

He said that, although the City claimed Wolwerivier was the only available site, people being removed from City-owned property were being relocated much closer to the city centre. "That is unconstitutional."

Karrisha Pillay, for the City, said her clients would have to file a considerable amount of additional paperwork to respond to residents, which could result in an extended trial.

She said the City also had "constitutional obligations to other poor people".

"The purpose of those transitional housing sites is to facilitate the social housing programme. If there are any units left, then it will be used for emergency housing."

Residents celebrate outside court

Acting Judge Mark Sher interjected: "I recall the City’s papers saying that they want to change apartheid spatial planning. And, in fact, we have now got sites in Woodstock and Salt River where they will be implementing this. Isn’t the [group of residents] then entitled to challenge this?"

Advocate Edward Fagan, for the Woodstock Hub, also opposed the application. He argued that his clients would suffer costs and their property rights would be prejudiced by a lengthy trial.

Also read: Judge questions City of Cape Town's plan to send Woodstock families to Wolwerivier

Fagan said his client had been unable to develop the property while residents remained in the homes.

"There will be considerable costs and time for this matter. There is a possibility of further affidavits being filed and arguments being made," he said.

Judge Sher granted the application and ordered the parties to file papers in response to the application. No court date has been set yet.

Outside court, some of the Bromwell Street residents celebrated their victory. One of the residents, Charnell Commando, said families were still opposed to moving to Wolwerivier.

We live in a world where facts and fiction get blurred
Who we choose to trust can have a profound impact on our lives. Join thousands of devoted South Africans who look to News24 to bring them news they can trust every day. As we celebrate 25 years, become a News24 subscriber as we strive to keep you informed, inspired and empowered.
Join News24 today
heading
description
username
Show Comments ()
Voting Booth
Do you think corruption-accused National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula will survive a motion of no confidence against her?
Please select an option Oops! Something went wrong, please try again later.
Results
No, her days are numbered
42% - 393 votes
Yes, the ANC caucus will protect her
58% - 544 votes
Vote
Rand - Dollar
18.94
-0.2%
Rand - Pound
23.91
-0.1%
Rand - Euro
20.43
+0.2%
Rand - Aus dollar
12.34
+0.1%
Rand - Yen
0.13
-0.2%
Platinum
910.50
+1.5%
Palladium
1,011.50
+1.0%
Gold
2,221.35
+1.2%
Silver
24.87
+0.9%
Brent-ruolie
86.09
-0.2%
Top 40
68,346
+1.0%
All Share
74,536
+0.8%
Resource 10
57,251
+2.8%
Industrial 25
103,936
+0.6%
Financial 15
16,502
-0.1%
All JSE data delayed by at least 15 minutes Iress logo
Editorial feedback and complaints

Contact the public editor with feedback for our journalists, complaints, queries or suggestions about articles on News24.

LEARN MORE